Programmable financial infrastructure for bounded autonomous finance.

Ryvra separates agent interfaces from financial authority, so teams can automate payments, markets and treasury workflows without handing unsafe control to AI.

  1. AI proposesCopilots, applications and operations systems submit financial intents through the Agent Gateway.
  2. Ryvra authorizesIdentity, mandates, versioned policy and independent deterministic risk decide what may execute.
  3. Deterministic systems executeAccounts, pay, markets and treasury run bounded commands, never open-ended agent actions.
  4. Ledger and settlement finalizeBalances, reconciliation and terminal outcomes become the record everything reconciles against.

Where to start

Engineers and institutional reviewers need different first pages. These are the two paths through the same control model.

For developers

Build against the primitives

Consistent primitives for identity, mandates, policy, risk and deterministic execution, instead of inventing custom agent safeguards per integration.

For institutions

Review the control boundary

Human-governed policy, deterministic risk and audit-ready evidence from proposal through authorization, execution, settlement and operator intervention.

Authority model

Bounded autonomy

Autonomous-finance workflows run only inside pre-defined authority boundaries. Agents propose intents. They do not receive open-ended wallet control or self-issued permissions.

Programmable control plane

Identity, mandates, policy and risk define what can be proposed, what can be authorized, and what deterministic systems are allowed to execute.

Truth and finality

Ledger and settlement are the source of truth for balances, state, reconciliation and terminal outcomes across every execution path.

Confidential execution

Sensitive financial state can be evaluated inside protected execution environments while preserving authorization, settlement discipline and auditability.

Architecture

Proposal, authorization, execution and settlement are separate concerns. The system stays programmable without granting unsafe authority to AI.

Ryvra platform architectureAgent clients connect through an Agent Gateway to a Control Plane and Execution Plane, with ledger and settlement as the truth layer and confidential execution as an extension.Agent clientsAI copilots, apps, ops systemsAgent GatewayIntent intakeIdentity binding and safe handoffControl PlaneIdentityMandatesPolicyIndependent risk engineExecution PlaneAccountsMarketsPayDeterministic settlement actionsLedger + Settlement truth layerFinal balances, reconciliation, provenanceand terminal stateConfidential executionPrivate statePrivate perps extension
Agents can propose intents, but Ryvra binds authority in the control plane and only deterministic systems can execute against the ledger and settlement truth layer.
Control plane

Decides what is permitted

  • Identity binds every workflow to a verified principal.
  • Mandates define what an operator or agent is allowed to propose.
  • Policy versions make approval logic explicit and reviewable.
  • Independent deterministic risk decides whether execution can proceed.
Execution plane

Carries out what was authorized

  • Accounts issue deterministic commands instead of open-ended agent actions.
  • Markets and Pay inherit the same authorization and settlement model.
  • Ledger and settlement publish final state, balances and reconciliation truth.
  • Confidential execution protects sensitive financial state and extends to private perps.

Control flow

Every intent crosses the same boundary in the same order, whether it originates from a copilot, an application or an internal operations system.

Ryvra control flowAI proposes an intent, Ryvra authorizes it with mandates and policy, deterministic systems execute, and the ledger and settlement layer publishes final state.1. AI proposesIntent onlyNo wallet authority2. Ryvra authorizesIdentity and mandatesPolicy and risk3. Systems executeDeterministic accountsPay and markets4. Ledger settlesFinal state and auditReplay-safe terminal record
The authority chain is explicit: proposals are bounded, authorization is programmable, execution is deterministic, and finality comes from ledger and settlement.

Security and trust

The security boundary is written down, not implied. These are the constraints the platform holds regardless of what an agent proposes.

Platform authority constraints, enforced independently of agent reasoning.
ControlStatus
Unrestricted AI wallet keysDenied
AI self-policy modificationDenied
Open-ended agent execution authorityDenied
Independent deterministic risk engineEnforced
Replay, rate and spend controlsEnforced
Kill switch and suspension controlsEnforced
End-to-end provenance and auditabilityEnforced

Bounded autonomy reduces the risk of opaque execution. Policy stays human-governed, risk stays deterministic, and audit evidence is preserved from intent intake through final settlement.

Lifecycle and provenance

Provenance is carried across the whole lifecycle, so a completed workflow can be explained after the fact rather than reconstructed.

Intent provenance lifecycleA lifecycle from mandate creation through authorization, execution, settlement, and audit retention with suspension and kill switch controls.1. Bindidentity2. Issuemandates3. Authorizepolicy + risk4. Executerecord + settle5. Auditreplay traceSuspension, spend caps, replay and rate controlsplus kill switches operate across the full lifecycle.
Every intent carries provenance from authority binding through settlement, with suspension and emergency controls available before and after execution.

Capabilities

Eight modules, one authorization model. Each page covers product scope, control boundaries and the related documentation.

Start where your review begins.

Integration and escalation contact: ecosystem@ryvra.org