Audit and Provenance

Use Ryvra’s provenance model to trace proposals, authorizations, deterministic execution, settlement, and emergency intervention paths.

#

Operators, developers, merchants, and reviewers who need to trace a workflow from proposal to final settlement and any later intervention.

#

#

When money moves, teams need a clear record of what was requested, who approved it, what executed, what the final result was, and whether anyone stepped in later.

#Provenance lifecycle

  1. Bind the originating principal and runtime to a verified identity context.
  2. Record mandate and policy versions used during authorization.
  3. Capture deterministic execution identifiers and downstream effects.
  4. Publish terminal balance and settlement state to the shared truth layer.
  5. Retain suspension, override, or kill-switch events alongside the original flow.

#Minimum evidence set

  • Intent or proposal ID.
  • Identity and mandate reference.
  • Policy and risk decision outputs.
  • Execution, event, and settlement identifiers.
  • Operator intervention history where applicable.

#Why it matters

  • Supports internal review, audit, reconciliation, and dispute handling.
  • Makes bounded autonomy legible to enterprise and regulatory stakeholders.
  • Prevents opaque execution claims by anchoring state changes to evidence.

Last updated: 2026-08-04

Compatibility window: Applies to the currently shipped Ryvra docs portal and interfaces published through August 2026.